Continuous integration for iOS with Nix and Buildkite

Pinterest Engineering
11 min readintermediate
--
View Original

Overview

The article discusses how Pinterest improved its continuous integration (CI) process for iOS development by adopting Nix and Buildkite, moving away from Jenkins. It highlights the challenges faced with the previous setup and the benefits of the new tools in terms of reproducibility, developer productivity, and CI efficiency.

What You'll Learn

1

How to create a reproducible development environment using Nix

2

Why transitioning from Jenkins to Buildkite can enhance CI efficiency

3

How to leverage Buildkite for parallel builds to reduce build times

Prerequisites & Requirements

  • Understanding of continuous integration concepts
  • Familiarity with Nix and Buildkite(optional)

Key Questions Answered

What challenges did Pinterest face with Jenkins?
Pinterest's previous CI setup with Jenkins was difficult to understand and maintain, leading to issues such as builds passing locally but failing on CI, difficulties in reproducing CI environments locally, and slow build times. These challenges prompted the search for more efficient alternatives.
How does Nix improve reproducibility in development environments?
Nix improves reproducibility by treating packages as immutable values, allowing developers to run commands in a consistent environment. This ensures that the same dependencies are used both locally and in CI, eliminating discrepancies that lead to build failures.
What are the benefits of using Buildkite for CI?
Buildkite allows any machine to become a build agent in seconds, supports parallel builds by default, and provides a user-friendly interface for identifying build failures. This significantly enhances CI efficiency and developer productivity compared to Jenkins.
What potential downsides are associated with using Buildkite?
One potential downside of Buildkite is that it is a service rather than open-source software, which ties its future to the company. Additionally, Buildkite requires remote execution, which raises security concerns that need to be managed through isolation and restrictions on agent commands.

Key Statistics & Figures

Build time reduction
up to 50 percent
This improvement is observed in certain jobs due to the parallel build capabilities of Buildkite.

Technologies & Tools

Some links below are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase.

Key Actionable Insights

1
Implement Nix to create a consistent development environment across your team.
By using Nix, you can ensure that all developers are working with the same dependencies and configurations, reducing the 'works on my machine' problem and improving overall productivity.
2
Transition to Buildkite for a more efficient CI process.
Buildkite's ability to quickly add new agents and run builds in parallel can significantly decrease build times and improve developer feedback loops, making it a strong alternative to Jenkins.
3
Utilize the nix-shell for running commands with specific dependencies.
This allows developers to execute commands in an environment tailored to their needs without worrying about local setup issues, thereby enhancing reproducibility and reducing setup time.

Common Pitfalls

1
Relying on multiple dependency management tools can complicate the development environment.
Using tools like rbenv and virtualenv can lead to issues with PATH management and version conflicts. It's essential to streamline dependency management to avoid these complications.

Related Concepts

Continuous Integration
Reproducibility In Development
CI/CD Best Practices
Dependency Management